<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GemaTech Technology Blog &#187; mobile voice recording legislation rogue trader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gematech.com/blog/tag/mobile-voice-recording-legislation-rogue-trader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog</link>
	<description>Changing the way we work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Voice Recording: Legislation or Rogue Trading The Catalyst?</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/06/28/mobile-voice-recording-legislation-or-rogue-trading-the-catalyst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/06/28/mobile-voice-recording-legislation-or-rogue-trading-the-catalyst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karen Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mobile voice recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile voice recording legislation rogue trader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a chance conversation with a collaegue recently I have begun to question whether it is the threat of legislation that will actually drive organisations to implement voice recording on their traders&#8217; mobile phones, or in fact a more pressing issue&#8230; Rogue Traders can be the thorn in the side of any major financial organisation, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a chance conversation with a collaegue recently I have begun to question whether it is the threat of legislation that will actually drive organisations to implement voice recording on their traders&#8217; mobile phones, or in fact a more pressing issue&#8230;<span id="more-1403"></span></p>
<p>Rogue Traders can be the thorn in the side of any major financial organisation, so banks should be enlisting all the latest technology in order to catch them wherever they can, including evidence revealed within both their landline and mobile voice communications. Now to be fair if a trader wants to have a conversation on a pay-as-you-go mobile phone there is very little that the powers that be can do to prevent a fraudulent trade. But if an organisation has <a href="www.gematech.com">voice recording</a> in place at least they can tell the press that they have made best efforts to monitor and record their traders activities.</p>
<p>In the wake of the banking and financial crisis, any hint or whiff of corruption will be thrust into the spolight quicker than you can say &#8216;here we go again&#8217; and therefore managing risk is at the top of every financial institutions agenda. If they can win the PR battle then perhaps they can win back public support, or at least their tolerance.<br />
<strong><br />
Top 6 rogue traders in recent years:</strong></p>
<p>Nick Leeson – $1.3 billion<br />
John Rusnak – $691 Million<br />
Mr. Copper – $2.5 Billion<br />
Liu Qibing – $200 Million – $1 Billion (unconfirmed)<br />
Brian Hunter and Amaranth – $6.5 Billion<br />
Jerome Kerviel – $7.1 Billion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/06/28/mobile-voice-recording-legislation-or-rogue-trading-the-catalyst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

