<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GemaTech Technology Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gematech.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog</link>
	<description>Changing the way we work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:10:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile Applications, Virtualisation and Cloud Computing: Top Business Continuty Technology Investments? by KeyComm Online</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/05/26/mobile-applications-virtualisation-and-cloud-computing-top-business-continuty-technology-investments/comment-page-1/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>KeyComm Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=1320#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>Really nice blog on cloud computing. Cloud Computing is the next generation computing technique being used these days. Most of the IT companies are using this technology. I myself have been searching about this. Thanks for the blog. I&#039;ll keep visiting your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice blog on cloud computing. Cloud Computing is the next generation computing technique being used these days. Most of the IT companies are using this technology. I myself have been searching about this. Thanks for the blog. I&#8217;ll keep visiting your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top Ten (or is that 9) Business Continuity Issues for 2010 by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/02/10/the-top-ten-or-is-that-9-business-continuity-issues-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=1009#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the swift reply Jon and the clear up in the numbering issue.

I personally think that compliance and industry standards can be treated quite separately. One is for governing the practice of business continuity and the other is ensuring that companies are compliant with external reglautory bodies, for example the FSA requires all regulated organisations to voice record landline calls and it is highly anticipated that they will bring in regulation for voice recording mobile phone calls very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the swift reply Jon and the clear up in the numbering issue.</p>
<p>I personally think that compliance and industry standards can be treated quite separately. One is for governing the practice of business continuity and the other is ensuring that companies are compliant with external reglautory bodies, for example the FSA requires all regulated organisations to voice record landline calls and it is highly anticipated that they will bring in regulation for voice recording mobile phone calls very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Top Ten (or is that 9) Business Continuity Issues for 2010 by Jon Seals</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2010/02/10/the-top-ten-or-is-that-9-business-continuity-issues-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Seals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=1009#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>One of the points in the article mentioned two items. I edited the article for content and style but didn&#039;t label each point by number. If anything, it was a design mistake ... and I do all the design. My bad.

Compliance probably falls under &quot;exploring industry standards&quot; but it is always a major issue. Thanks for reading and providing the link.

Jon Seals
Editor-In-Chief
Disaster Recovery Journal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the points in the article mentioned two items. I edited the article for content and style but didn&#8217;t label each point by number. If anything, it was a design mistake &#8230; and I do all the design. My bad.</p>
<p>Compliance probably falls under &#8220;exploring industry standards&#8221; but it is always a major issue. Thanks for reading and providing the link.</p>
<p>Jon Seals<br />
Editor-In-Chief<br />
Disaster Recovery Journal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GemaTech 2009 Annual Review by Conference Call Review - GemaTech 2009 Annual Review &#124; GemaTech Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2009/12/15/gematech-2009-annual-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Conference Call Review - GemaTech 2009 Annual Review &#124; GemaTech Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=750#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading here: GemaTech 2009 Annual Review &#124; GemaTech Technology Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading here: GemaTech 2009 Annual Review | GemaTech Technology Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Job tax?: new workplace parking levy gets go ahead by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2009/09/18/job-tax-new-workplace-parking-levy-gets-go-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=249#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Clearly not all jobs are suitable for remote working. I certainly don&#039;t see shop assistants working from home!

How many people actually need to go to the council offices for services from them? They only choose to be in the town centres because that is where the offices have &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; been. Clearly they need to be there for registrations eg. births, deaths and marriages. But what about the people who are not customer facing?

There are pleanty of back office staff who could perform their jobs more cost effectively from another location...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly not all jobs are suitable for remote working. I certainly don&#8217;t see shop assistants working from home!</p>
<p>How many people actually need to go to the council offices for services from them? They only choose to be in the town centres because that is where the offices have <em>always</em> been. Clearly they need to be there for registrations eg. births, deaths and marriages. But what about the people who are not customer facing?</p>
<p>There are pleanty of back office staff who could perform their jobs more cost effectively from another location&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Job tax?: new workplace parking levy gets go ahead by shaun Hollingworth</title>
		<link>http://www.gematech.com/blog/2009/09/18/job-tax-new-workplace-parking-levy-gets-go-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun Hollingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gematech.com/blog/?p=249#comment-262</guid>
		<description>&quot;However if the scheme does take off then it strengthens the argument for allowing widespread remote working for jobs&quot;

Shelve stacking by remote control ? Serving customers by remote control ?


Making things in a factory by remote control ?

If the councils advocate such workings, why do they have their offices in the town or city center with loads of employees and enormous car parks ? Most of what they do, could be done this way I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However if the scheme does take off then it strengthens the argument for allowing widespread remote working for jobs&#8221;</p>
<p>Shelve stacking by remote control ? Serving customers by remote control ?</p>
<p>Making things in a factory by remote control ?</p>
<p>If the councils advocate such workings, why do they have their offices in the town or city center with loads of employees and enormous car parks ? Most of what they do, could be done this way I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
